Plan the work
Convert a legal instruction into a matter-scoped plan with source boundaries, required outputs, and review expectations.
Agents research, draft, review, and organize work. Lawyers make the call.
Legeva agents are not positioned as a replacement for legal judgment. They are controlled workflows that help teams prepare, organize, and review work product with a clear human decision path.
Convert a legal instruction into a matter-scoped plan with source boundaries, required outputs, and review expectations.
Retrieve from permitted documents, knowledge, playbooks, and connected systems instead of unsupported open-ended context.
Assemble drafts, research notes, issue lists, redlines, and structured findings with rationale and source traceability.
Route the output to a human reviewer who can edit, approve, escalate, reject, or preserve the work as evidence.
The core pattern is deliberately simple and reviewable: describe task, agent executes inside policy, lawyer reviews.
Describe task
Review the target company vendor agreements for assignment, termination, and unusual liability language.
Agent executes
Plan
Retrieve
Prepare
Lawyer reviews
01
A lawyer or approved team member gives the matter context, source scope, desired output, and review expectation.
02
Legeva plans the work, gathers permitted sources, prepares work product, and records what was used.
03
A human reviewer accepts, edits, escalates, or rejects the output with the audit trail preserved.
Legeva organizes agents by the work surface legal teams already recognize, from research and review to transactions, compliance, and legal operations.
Agents that map issues, compare authorities, summarize source positions, and prepare research memos.
Agents that classify documents, find risk signals, prepare issue lists, and support reviewer decisions.
Agents that prepare first drafts, redline positions, clauses, playbook notes, and negotiation briefs.
Agents that organize diligence, compare contract portfolios, and prepare structured findings.
Agents that monitor obligations, compare policies, and assemble control evidence for review.
Agents that route intake, summarize demand, prepare status updates, and automate repeatable work.
This library shows the initial Legeva agent architecture. Each agent is defined by inputs, outputs, and controls so teams can evaluate fit before deployment.
Builds a source-grounded research plan, compares authorities, and prepares a memo draft for lawyer review.
Maps favorable, adverse, and unresolved authorities so litigators can evaluate argument strength.
Classifies documents against matter-specific issues and prepares reviewer-facing summaries.
Flags potential privilege indicators and prepares context for an attorney-led privilege decision.
Prepares a first draft or section revision using approved precedent, matter facts, and style guidance.
Compares positions, proposes clause edits, and explains negotiation tradeoffs for counsel review.
Reviews transaction materials, extracts key findings, and organizes risks into a diligence register.
Extracts terms, deviations, renewal obligations, assignment issues, and contract risk patterns.
Tracks regulatory changes against approved topics and prepares attorney-reviewed impact notes.
Compares policies against legal requirements, control language, and internal standards.
Classifies new legal requests, collects missing context, and routes work to the right queue.
Summarizes legal demand, bottlenecks, review queues, and adoption patterns from actual workflow activity.
Agent behavior should be explicit enough for legal leadership, security, and practice teams to evaluate. Legeva exposes the policies that shape each run.
Agents can prepare, organize, draft, and escalate. Final legal reliance stays with the reviewer your team assigns.
Instruction templates define what an agent may attempt.
Source boundaries define which repositories, matters, and documents can be used.
Action policies define whether an agent can draft, summarize, update, export, or only prepare work.
Review gates define who can approve outputs before handoff.
Audit records retain instructions, sources, drafts, reviewer actions, and release decisions.
Legal agents need precise access control, constrained actions, auditable outputs, and operational visibility. Legeva treats those as product requirements.
Agents only operate on approved repositories, matters, and documents available to the requesting user or workflow.
High-impact outputs can require named reviewer approval before they leave the workspace or update a system.
Instructions, retrieved sources, transformations, draft versions, reviewer actions, and handoffs can be traced.
Administrators can stage agents, constrain actions, define retention expectations, and monitor usage patterns.
Agent evaluation
Bring a research question, review protocol, diligence checklist, drafting playbook, or legal operations workflow. Legeva can be framed around the source boundaries and review gates your team needs.
Opens an email to contact@legeva.com. Share the agent workflow, source boundary, and reviewer role you want to test.